I recently experimented with remote monitoring by combining a bat listener kit with an ESP8266 development board, also known as the cheeseboard. Utilizing the features of the ESP8266 micro – controller, the objective was to design a system that would send me email alerts whenever a bat was found in my garden. Despite being initially a lighthearted project, this one suggested possible useful applications for remote monitoring situations.
To accomplish this, I carefully connected the micro – controller output from the bat listener kit to a GPIO pin on the ESP8266, making sure to use a 3.3V zener on this connection to prevent voltage irregularities. It was successful to make use of the Cheeseboard ESP8266 kit’s features, particularly D1 (GPIO5) for bat listener pulse counting. It’s important to remember that D0, which was initially under consideration, had problems with interrupt service routines, which led to the change to D1.
A key component of this setup was power supply. The bat listener required a 9V DC source, whereas the ESP8266 ran on a 5V supply. A DC – DC step – up converter built on the MT3608 module was used to close this gap at a reasonable price. With a small potentiometer allowing for precise voltage adjustment, this clever gadget effectively raised the voltage from 5V to 9V. In order to ensure stable operation, the potentiometer setting was secured with nail varnish to prevent inadvertent changes.
The project’s software component consisted of developing a rather basic but useful code fragment. While an Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) tracked pulse detections from the bat listener, WiFi manager enabled seamless WiFi connectivity. An email alert with the pulse count was sent when the pulse threshold was exceeded. Although the pulse count might provide information about the bat species, more research and development were deemed necessary.
Following the advice of reliable tutorials, integrating interrupts on the ESP8266 turned out to be a manageable task. The system effectively counted bat detections within each sampling period by attaching an interrupt to the assigned pin and defining an ISR to handle pulse increments. To improve accuracy, error detection systems were put in place to reduce false triggers and maximize email alerts based on valid bat detections.
Two main factors dominated the email distribution decision-making process. First, a sufficient number of detections within a sample period indicated a bat presence. Second, making sure there were no additional detections within a given window confirmed a reliable detection and prompted the email to be sent with pertinent detection metrics.
The EMailSender library by xreef, which simplifies email handling, was a notable addition mt3608 dcdc to the project. Email transmission was made seamless by configuring an account, modifying security settings, and naming recipients. The email notifications were enhanced with temporal context by the inclusion of a timestamp in the email content, which was taken from TimeNTP_ESP8266WiFi examples.
The project’s durability in outdoor environments was highlighted by practical factors like weatherproofing the equipment in a sealed enclosure. Future versions could investigate solar – powered configurations with optimized sleep modes for increased energy efficiency, addressing sustainable operational needs.
Extended monitoring capabilities are made possible by the project’s potential for remote logging, which switches from email alerts to data logging on an SD card for call frequencies. The project’s evolution toward autonomous operation is consistent with the inclusion of a remote power source, such as a solar rechargeable power bank.
In conclusion, this project combined nature and technology to highlight the opportunities for remote monitoring using bat detection systems. The path from pulse detection to email alerts is evidence of creative use of technology for environmental awareness and preservation initiatives.
Italiano 
English 
Français 
Deutsch 
Español 
